影音測試:
擁有 PureVideo HD 硬體加速技術,下面接著採用兩部HD畫質的影片做這部分的測試
E8400 CPU軟體解壓縮VC-1影片測試
GTX 280 硬體解壓縮VC-1影片測試
E8400 CPU軟體解壓縮H.264影片測試
GTX 280 硬體解壓縮H.264影片測試
影音部分小結:
GTX 280 內建的解壓縮引擎在H.264的表現不錯,平均值大約10.96%,最高峰值僅在18.38%,而僅靠E8400作軟體解壓縮CPU的佔用率就會提高到約93.99%
VC-1解碼上,因VP2引擎能協助3/4的硬體解壓,其效果不如H.264解壓來的好,平均值約17.17%,最高峰值在32.92%
遊戲測試:
灌好了crysis後,不自覺的就玩了兩天,會過神來發現我不是要來測試的嗎?趕緊跳回桌面XD
測試設備:
CPU:INTEL X3350
MOBO:ASUS Maximus Extreme
RAM:Kingston DDR3-1600
HDD:WD RaptorX 150GB
POWER:Seventeam V-Force 850W
註:測試過程顯卡無開殼,正常空冷跑
VeryHigh 顯示卡預設值:602/1296/1107
Run #1- DX10 1024x768 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 44.815
Run #2- DX10 1024x768 AA=2x, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 40.535
Run #3- DX10 1024x768 AA=4x, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 38.77
Run #4- DX10 1024x768 AA=8x, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 37.565
Run #5- DX10 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 34.61
Run #6- DX10 1280x1024 AA=2x, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 29.88
Run #7- DX10 1280x1024 AA=4x, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 28.305
Run #8- DX10 1280x1024 AA=8x, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 27.31
Run #9- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 26.625
Run #10- DX10 1680x1050 AA=2x, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 22.595
Run #11- DX10 1680x1050 AA=4x, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 21.055
Run #12- DX10 1680x1050 AA=8x, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 20.24
VeryHigh 顯示卡超頻:702/1512/1188
Run #1- DX10 1024x768 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 46.7
Run #2- DX10 1024x768 AA=2x, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 43.745
Run #3- DX10 1024x768 AA=4x, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 42.485
Run #4- DX10 1024x768 AA=8x, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 41.785
Run #5- DX10 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 39.36
Run #6- DX10 1280x1024 AA=2x, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 33.98
Run #7- DX10 1280x1024 AA=4x, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 32.13
Run #8- DX10 1280x1024 AA=8x, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 30.895
Run #9- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 30.385
Run #10- DX10 1680x1050 AA=2x, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 25.68
Run #11- DX10 1680x1050 AA=4x, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 23.875
Run #12- DX10 1680x1050 AA=8x, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 22.935
遊戲部分小結:
在顯示卡預設值下,跑出來的成績相當驚人,大家如果有翻翻之前例如9800GTX或是其他顯卡所跑的數據拿來當作參考
不難發現 nVIDIA 的 GTX 280 所測出來的FPS有再衝了10幾張,連在 1680x1050 AA=8x 都有 20.24 的水準,滿可怕的
超頻方面,分別超上了 核心702 / SHADER 1512 / 記憶體1188,雖然數字看起來沒有很高,不過在新的架構引領下
跑出來的效能都能再多逼個2張左右的FPS,這樣看 多2張或許有些人覺得沒甚麼,不過回頭看看前代的單核卡王相比
你就會知道它能拉開到甚麼地步,但礙於製程,頻率或許承受不了太多的熱很難再拉高,不過光是這樣,新卡王非它莫屬
3DMARK測試:
3DMARK 測試我選擇 3DMark Vantage 來做測試的數據參考,畢竟未來的遊戲除了有DX10之外
更重要的就是有具備物理性,簡單的說遊戲不會單調
以美式足球來說,以前可能一碰撞,跌倒的方式只有四五種,玩久了怎麼看到一樣
而加入物理性質後,會依照碰觸不同的點,來做物理運算及反射,畫面出來的跌倒方式就有幾千種,甚至更多
而 3DMark Vantage 有加入未來遊戲所需的物理性,而出來的測試結果,也有其依序性及公平性
顯示卡預設值:602/1296/1107
顯示卡超頻:702/1512/1188
大家會想怎麼CPU的分數這麼多,不過這是正常的現象,因為我有安裝177.39之外,還有物理驅動
分數的增加是反映在CPU上面,之前我記得有人有跑未有物理的測試分數,所以再跟有的來做比較
的確是有所成長,也間接得知GTX280在未來遊戲所需具備的條件,GTX200 SERIES已經準備好囉!
[ 本帖最後由 hyde211 於 2008-6-27 17:07 編輯 ] |