補測試文..............
先前忘了說明96GOS只安裝驅動PhyX驅動沒安裝
9600GSO
3D MARK 05 1024*768 16,403
4670
3D MARK 05 1024*768 14,996
9600GSO
3D MARK 06 1280*1024 10,125
4670
3D MARK 05 1280*1024 8,160
FurMark 1.4
9600GSO
在執行中截取
1024*768 NOAA FPS平均 37
1280*1024 NOAA FPS平均 22
FurMark 1.4
4670
在執行中截取
1024*768 NOAA FPS平均 50
1280*1024 NOAA FPS平均 32
CRYSIS 末日之戰
9600GSO
Run #1- DX9 1024x768 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 38.38
Run #2- DX9 1024x768 AA=2x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 32.14
Run #3- DX9 1024x768 AA=4x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 29.85
Run #4- DX9 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 25.425
Run #5- DX9 1280x1024 AA=2x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 21.595
Run #6- DX9 1280x1024 AA=4x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 19.955
4670
Run #1- DX9 1024x768 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 39.205
Run #2- DX9 1024x768 AA=2x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 27.87
Run #3- DX9 1024x768 AA=4x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 26.42
Run #4- DX9 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 26.665
Run #5- DX9 1280x1024 AA=2x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 18.495
Run #6- DX9 1280x1024 AA=4x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 17.575
總結:
3D MARK表現上9600GOS表現比較強
FurMark 1.4 R4670終於贏了一次
CRYSIS 末日之戰 9600GOS 在1024*768與1280*1024 NOAA 小輸R4670
但開2AA 4AA 9600GOS卻又小贏 R4670
溫度表現
9600GSO搭配是拉麵風扇散熱效果不錯,在測試中最高只到58度表現不錯
R4670是搭配放射狀的鋁鰭散熱器,看起來不怎麼樣,但溫度表現卻很好
最高紀錄48度.....................50度都不到
以上是小弟的測試,提共給網友參考 |