AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs Intel Core i5-9400F搭配NVIDIA GT1030-入門電競CP值戰爭
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/title.png 入門電競CP值戰爭
電競市場競爭越來越激烈，許多使用者都希望買到價格實惠且效能表現優異的產品，入門電競主機若還需要一點運算上的應用時，處理器就必須要挑選中階產品，不過許多玩家在預算上有考量，在挑選產品上則必須要挑選CP值較高的產品，這次要針對這樣的需求來比較AMD與Intel的組合，AMD平台部分採用AMD Ryzen 5 2400G搭配B450晶片組(總價格約NT$7750元)，Intel則是採用Intel Core i5-9400F搭配B360M晶片組與NVIDIA GT1030顯卡(總價格約NT$10800元)，這兩個組合有NT$3050元的價差，究竟效能表現差異多少，多花了NT$3000元到底有沒有價值!!相信許多玩家一定很好奇，馬上就來看這次的PK賽啦
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/title.pngPK平台一覽
▼AMD Ryzen 5 2400G搭配ASUS PRIME B450M-K主機板，AMD平台皆為處理器與記憶體可超頻，所以可透過超頻提升效能表現
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/IMG_4921.JPG
▼Intel Core i5-9400F搭配ASUS PRIME B360-K主機板與ASUS GT1030 2GB GDDR5顯卡
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/IMG_4924.JPG
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/title.png AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs Intel Core i5-9400F搭配NVIDIA GT1030
本次測試使用AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs Intel Core i5-9400F搭配NVIDIA GT1030進行比較，測試軟體部分會採用CineBench R15、CineBench R20、New 3DMark Time Spy/Fire Strike Extreme/Cloud Gate/Sky Diver/Night Raid與全境封鎖2，馬上就來看這精采的PK賽
▼全境封鎖2遊戲設置解析度為1920*1080，畫質部分設定為低
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/Tom_1.jpg
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/Tom.jpg
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G預設時脈測試
CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Cooler: AMD Wraith Stealth散熱器
MB: ASUS PRIME B450M-K
RAM: GeIL Dragon RAM DDR4 8GB*2 @ DDR4-3000 CL16
VGA: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Storage: WD Black 1TB NVMe SSD
PSU: Seasonic FOCUS+ GOLD 550W
OS: Windows 10專業版 64 Bit
▼CineBench R15 OpenGL:73.01 fps CPU:796cb
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/R15_2400G.JPG
▼CineBench R20 CPU:1793cb
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/R20_2400G.JPG
▼3DMark Cloud Gate :16340
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/3DMark_C_2400G.JPG
▼3DMark Fire Strike Extreme:1516
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/3DMark_FE_2400G.JPG
▼3DMark Sky Diver :11522
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/3DMark_S_2400G.JPG
▼3DMark Night Raid :11621
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/3DMark_N_2400G.JPG
▼3DMark Time Spy :1212
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/3DMark_T_2400G.JPG
▼全境封鎖2硬體效能檢測平均：39 FPS 分數：3524
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/Tom_2400G.jpg
▼全境封鎖2遊戲畫面約33張
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/Tom_1_2400G.jpg
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G超頻測試
CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 2400G @ 4.0GHz
Cooler: AMD Wraith Stealth散熱器
MB: ASUS PRIME B450M-K
RAM: GeIL Dragon RAM DDR4 8GB*2 @ DDR4-3000 CL16
VGA: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 @ 1500MHz
Storage: WD Black 1TB NVMe SSD
PSU: Seasonic FOCUS+ GOLD 550W
OS: Windows 10專業版 64 Bit
▼CineBench R15 OpenGL:77.09 fps CPU:871cb
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/R15_2400G_OC.JPG
▼CineBench R20 CPU:1947cb
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/R20_2400G_OC.JPG
▼3DMark Cloud Gate :18618
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/3DMark_C_2400G_OC.JPG
▼3DMark Fire Strike Extreme:1626
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/3DMark_FE_2400G_OC.JPG
▼3DMark Sky Diver :12746
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/3DMark_S_2400G_OC.JPG
▼3DMark Night Raid :13075
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/3DMark_N_2400G_OC.JPG
▼3DMark Time Spy :1335
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/3DMark_T_2400G_OC.JPG
▼全境封鎖2硬體效能檢測平均：48 FPS 分數：4314
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/Tom_2400G_OC.jpg
▼全境封鎖2遊戲畫面約43張
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/Tom_1_2400G_OC.jpg
Intel Core i5-9400F搭配NVIDIA GT1030測試
CPU: Intel Core i5-9400F
Cooler: Intel 原廠風扇
MB: ASUS PRIME B360-K
RAM: GeIL Dragon RAM DDR4 8GB*2 @ DDR4-2666 CL16
VGA: ASUS GT1030 2GB GDDR5
Storage: WD Black 1TB NVMe SSD
PSU: Seasonic FOCUS+ GOLD 550W
OS: Windows 10專業版 64 Bit
▼CineBench R15 OpenGL:100.42 fps CPU:939cb
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/R15_9400F.JPG
▼CineBench R20 CPU:2327cb
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/R20_9400F.JPG
▼3DMark Cloud Gate :15696
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/3DMark_C_9400F.JPG
▼3DMark Fire Strike Extreme:1639
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/3DMark_FE_9400F.JPG
▼3DMark Sky Diver :12014
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/3DMark_S_9400F.JPG
▼3DMark Night Raid :13818
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/3DMark_N_9400F.JPG
▼3DMark Time Spy :1332
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/3DMark_T_9400F.JPG
▼全境封鎖2硬體效能檢測平均：27 FPS 分數：2452
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/Tom_9400F.jpg
▼全境封鎖2遊戲畫面約20張
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/pic/Tom_1_9400F.jpg
▼CineBench R15與R20可以看到Intel Core i5-9400F在運算上比較有優勢，效能表現比較優異一點
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/R15_1.jpg
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/R20_1.jpg
▼New 3DMark部分 AMD Ryzen 5 2400G未超頻前有小落後，超頻後則與Intel Core i5-9400F搭配GT1030效能接近甚至有小領先
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/3DMark_1.jpg
▼全境封鎖2在Benchmark與實際運行遊戲中AMD Ryzen 5 2400G未超頻就已大幅度領先Intel Core i5-9400F搭配GT1030，超頻後更是大幅度領先
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2400G/Tom_1.jpg
https://i2.wp.com/john-3c.000webhostapp.com/title.png總結
看完上面的測試後可以發現AMD Ryzen 5 2400G為超頻前的顯卡效能小落後NVIDIA GT1030，超頻後則相當接近NVIDIA GT1030甚至是小幅度領先，全境封鎖2的表現不論有無超頻都大幅度領先NVIDIA GT1030，處理器表現Intel Core i5-9400F擁有較佳的浮點運算能力，不過AMD Ryzen 5 2400G表現也不遜色，整體來說AMD Ryzen 5 2400G CP值比Intel Core i5-9400F搭配NVIDIA GT1030組合來的高，且可以省下約NT$3000元，這次的測試PK就到這邊，以上資訊提供給需要的玩家參考。
頁:
[1]