johnuahuang 發表於 2014-7-24 21:40:26

入門顯卡大車拚-NVidia GT 730 PK AMD R7 250



https://www.xfastest.com/images/xftitle.png前言
近年來內建顯示卡效能越來越強悍,從內建顯示卡僅能文書上網,至今現在內建顯示卡要玩基本的3D遊戲已不再是問題,故入門級獨立顯示卡效能也必須越來越強悍,不然就會被內建顯示卡取代;目前顯示卡部分有兩大廠可選擇NVinda與AMD,他們的產品也是各有特色,也各有愛好使用者,本次主要測試入門等級顯示卡,一方面效能比內建顯卡優秀外,價格上也不是這麼的貴,讓想玩一般遊戲的玩家有個參考,本次使用Gigabyte GT 730 2GB GDDR5測試,這張卡也是業界第一使用2GB GDDR5的產品,採用第二代超耐久零件,更低溫、更節能、更耐久,散熱部分使用自製10公分大風扇,並可搭配OC GURUII超頻軟體做超頻,以下就是兩大主角的PK了

https://www.xfastest.com/images/xftitle.pngGT 730介紹

▼這次測試的GT 730為技嘉產品,採用2GB GDDR5記憶體
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/201219l1k2xuuze2xzrl2x.jpg

▼GT 730正反面一覽,採用10公分大風扇,散熱效果沒話說
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/201225je5jemlaeyyc2fha.jpg
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/201225qehbr2mmwrbhxbrw.jpg

▼輸出部分有D-SUB、HDMI 與DVI-D
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/201226cnall0z1a425jw9t.jpg

https://www.xfastest.com/images/xftitle.png細部用料

▼背面有4顆螺絲拆開後正面一覽
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/201228kpnmryoezshvs2ao.jpg

▼前半部用料一覽
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/201228vzz61py6qssjjqop.jpg

▼後半部用料一覽
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/201229j656snhsy2hizb5f.jpg

▼晶片後方背面放滿了電容,提升GPU供電穩定度
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/201231fs3mzttj5kykttpn.jpg

▼記憶體部分採用Samsung K4G41325FC-HC04,GDDR5 4顆組成2G容量
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/201229ajdcpacdjt0r7l6f.jpg

▼GT 730(GK208)核心晶片驗明正身,MIT台灣製品
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/201229le8yzt8bi28nnp7e.jpg

https://www.xfastest.com/images/xftitle.png測試平台與環境


測試平台
CPU:Intel i5-4670K
Cooler: XIGMATEK GaiaII
MB: SuperMicro C7Z97-OCE
RAM: Kingston BEAST DDR3-2133 CL11 32GB Kit(8G*4)
Storage: Transcend SSD 720 128GB
PSU: Steventeam 750W
OS: Windows 7 旗艦版 64 Bit

▼硬體配備驗明正身
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/090905k1jut6r1g1yu6ml3.jpg

▼3DMark06:13732
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/090811u0vgh5gaoa7eoye5.jpg

▼3DMark Vantage Performance Mode:P8948
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/090823xgbngb0eobhhyppk.jpg

▼3DMark 11 Performance Mode:P2345
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/090814qzigoqems6j6wqsq.jpg

▼3DMark 2013
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/090817nzpwcvll46bqpvc6.jpg

▼CINEBENCH R11 X64:54.76 fps
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/090840pa31fagarfzoy1bs.jpg

▼CINEBENCH R15 X64:64.40 fps
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/090842pbervedrar1nqy19.jpg

▼BIO5 1920x1080 DirectX 9.0C ARGB8 TestA:48.3 fps
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/090827djouujhyok35gvoa.jpg

▼BIO5 1920x1080 DirectX 9.0C ARGB8 TestB:48.2 fps
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/090832i2z713pmm1r9718r.jpg

▼BIO6 1920x1080 DirectX 9.0C ARGB8:2528
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/090835d1b5mbutdvhutzcb.jpg

▼DMC4 1920x1080 DirectX 9.0C A2RGB10
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/090851ompiioc3mowdpmvk.jpg

▼FF IXV 1920x1080:1793
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/090901ujv7eah9hqazhsav.jpg

▼Heaven 1920x1080 8xAA
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/090910xkh7b41c1ch6f6lb.jpg

▼LOST PLANET 2 1920x1080 DirectX 9.0C MSAA8X TestA:27.6 fps
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/090913xm44hlbmw4nmhegb.jpg

▼LOST PLANET 2 1920x1080 DirectX 9.0C MSAA8X TestB:28.6 fps
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/090917dbcfgb8xxixuu1ix.jpg

▼SF IV 1920x1080 C16XQAA:6279
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/090923by56ug7fwnbggg6t.jpg

▼The Last Remnant 1920x1080:48.19 fps
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/090927jjn3vz534ko44af3.jpg

https://www.xfastest.com/images/xftitle.png對手產品比較

本次採用價位接近的R7 250做比較,現在就來看看R7 250表現

▼硬體配備驗明正身
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/103420g9f6kfx0rmmvcip6.jpg

▼3DMark06:10770
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/103359vrfkpv3ri979hvaq.jpg

▼3DMark Vantage Performance Mode:P9278
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/103403mbc4cd5fg463cee9.jpg

▼3DMark 11 Performance Mode:P2623
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/103401ozicz1ydepzzc7d0.jpg

▼3DMark 2013
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/103402yodjk0rw0wog0qbw.jpg

▼CINEBENCH R11 X64:45.27 fps
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/103408nh2hg616r5j2hrfx.jpg

▼CINEBENCH R15 X64:51.23 fps
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/103408flf0els8rrpopfkz.jpg

▼BIO5 1920x1080 DirectX 9.0C ARGB8 TestA:43.2 fps
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/103404b4k9zttb4tmflw3i.jpg

▼BIO5 1920x1080 DirectX 9.0C ARGB8 TestB:45.6 fps
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/103405full27u7gq243qw5.jpg

▼BIO6 1920x1080 DirectX 9.0C ARGB8:2042
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/103406bkmp4wk4hk8a4lzd.jpg

▼DMC4 1920x1080 DirectX 9.0C A2RGB10
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/103411slxxmztl6767uxlq.jpg

▼FF IXV 1920x1080:1337
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/103416k2utwbec22bbgqug.jpg

▼Heaven 1920x1080 8xAA
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/103423j3zz3jvddm5d3mmd.jpg

▼LP2 1920x1080 DirectX 9.0C MSAA8X TestA:26.9 fps
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/103424oggmjta6aaj7m7mf.jpg

▼LP2 1920x1080 DirectX 9.0C MSAA8X TestB:30.9 fps
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/103428rgczztthjxxoyxhp.jpg

▼SF IV 1920x1080 C16XQAA:5197
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/103429x77yn7uos483axtt.jpg

▼TLR 1920x1080:3415 fps
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/103430uedd9ctjjtuzz9j8.jpg

▼效能測試比較總表:從表中可觀察出兩張卡在3DMark的測試軟體中各有千秋,在遊戲的Benchmark中GT730的表現比R7 250亮眼許多,在許多遊戲的表現上都有不錯的成績
https://www.xfastest.com/data/attachment/album/201407/24/120922k005sa52hz2ilbnz.jpg

https://www.xfastest.com/images/xftitle.png總結
雖然GT 730為入門級顯卡,在各項表現都相當不錯,GT 730核心代號為GK208,屬於Kepler架構,不論是在效能、溫度與耗功耗上都相當稱職,加上目前新款的GT 730採用2GB GDDR5的記憶體,讓效能與遊戲的順暢度又更上一層樓,與同等價位的對手產品比較又有不錯的表現,整體表現小贏對手R7 250,以入門等級產品來說GT 730算是一款不錯的選擇,可以玩些輕度遊戲像是LOL或是跑跑卡丁車那一類的,加上技嘉這次採用的散熱模組相當不錯使用10公分大風扇,玩起遊戲也不會有太大的噪音產生,如果對超頻有興趣的玩家還可利用原廠所附贈的超頻軟體做調校,但別忘了注意散熱唷;現在的入門卡效能不再那麼的不堪一擊,在這A與N的戰爭中,各家都有愛用者,各家的卡對不同的遊戲也都各有做最佳化,玩家們必須挑選符合自己需求的顯卡來做挑選,當然現在NVidia有GeForce Experience可以針對各遊戲做出最佳調整,讓玩家可以有更好的遊戲體驗。

以上資訊提供給需要的玩家參考

starcraftgod 發表於 2014-7-25 15:33:21

技嘉 GT 730 配10公分大風扇 真的很安靜

而且對於輕度玩家來說,這張入門卡真的游刃有餘

感謝分享囉~

admin 發表於 2014-7-26 06:30:11

感謝玩家熱情發帖,XFastest的成長有勞各位一齊努力打拼!

XF-Team 發表於 2014-7-26 09:14:46

XFastest FB粉絲贈獎活動你報名了沒?免費大獎等你拚人品帶回家 https://xfun.cc/ng8wh

XF-Staff 發表於 2014-7-28 03:52:17

發文者骨骼精奇,發文風格特異,敢問有沒有興趣跟著XF團隊深造

Goldaward 發表於 2014-8-1 16:19:06

風扇大,靜音效果應該不錯的吧!!!

也只有技嘉才這麼做的呀!!

不過也沒想到現在的GT730已經這麼強大唷!!!!
頁: [1]
查看完整版本: 入門顯卡大車拚-NVidia GT 730 PK AMD R7 250