相同PCB的雙生兒 : Colamax 8800GT & 9600GSO簡測
8800GT剛推出時, 憑著不到$2000的價錢與不錯的效能, 俘虜了不少用家的錢包但自從對手3870降價後, 8800GT一路因為成本較高而售價居高不下
所以各廠商紛紛推出非公版8800GT降低售價, 以増強競爭力
今次測試的是一對使用相同PCB的雙生兒
Colamax 8800GT & 9600GSO
https://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n251/BlackBirdzzz/Colamax%2088GT%2096GSO/P1110219.jpg
先來8800GT
https://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n251/BlackBirdzzz/Colamax%2088GT%2096GSO/P1110207.jpg
採用了Zerotherm GX810 Heatsink, 有效壓制GPU的溫度麼?, 待會自有分曉
https://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n251/BlackBirdzzz/Colamax%2088GT%2096GSO/P1110210.jpg
GPU使用三相供電, Ram則獨立單相
https://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n251/BlackBirdzzz/Colamax%2088GT%2096GSO/P1110211.jpg
https://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n251/BlackBirdzzz/Colamax%2088GT%2096GSO/P1110212.jpg
G92-270核心
https://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n251/BlackBirdzzz/Colamax%2088GT%2096GSO/P1110214.jpg
上平台測試~
Athlon 64x2 4400+ @ 2.4GHz
Sapphire Pure Crossfire RD580
ADATA Vitesta Extreme Edition DDR2-800 CL4-4-4-12
溫度測試時環境溫度約25~26度
先來Default :
600/1800, 很標準的公版時脈, 可惜我的平台CPU拉低了整體分數
https://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n251/BlackBirdzzz/Colamax%2088GT%2096GSO/8800GTDefault3DMark.png
再來個705/2150
https://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n251/BlackBirdzzz/Colamax%2088GT%2096GSO/8800GT70521503DMark.png
看看溫度, 還可以, 下圖為跑了5分鐘ATi Tool的溫度
https://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n251/BlackBirdzzz/Colamax%2088GT%2096GSO/88GTDefaultfulloadtemp.png
https://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n251/BlackBirdzzz/Colamax%2088GT%2096GSO/88GTDefaultfulloadtempgraph.png
再用700/2150跑一趟
https://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n251/BlackBirdzzz/Colamax%2088GT%2096GSO/88GT7002150atitool5minpass.png
總結?未到 XD
9600GSO呢?
Heatsink很不同, 但仍然很大
https://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n251/BlackBirdzzz/Colamax%2088GT%2096GSO/P1110225.jpg
採用了Samsung 1ns GDDR3, 標準時脈2GHz
https://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n251/BlackBirdzzz/Colamax%2088GT%2096GSO/P1110223.jpg
供電部分差不多, 但電感有點不同
https://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n251/BlackBirdzzz/Colamax%2088GT%2096GSO/P1110222.jpg
https://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n251/BlackBirdzzz/Colamax%2088GT%2096GSO/P1110224.jpg
預設時脈真的很保守, 只有550/1600...
https://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n251/BlackBirdzzz/Colamax%2088GT%2096GSO/96GSODefault3DMark.png
既然這麼保守就來點刺激XD
730/2150
https://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n251/BlackBirdzzz/Colamax%2088GT%2096GSO/96GSO73021503DMark.png
可能有人會懷疑那個不能給人觀感刺激的Heatsink效能會很差, 但其實還可以的
用Default跑5分鍾ATi Tool
https://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n251/BlackBirdzzz/Colamax%2088GT%2096GSO/96GSODefaultfulloadtemp.png
https://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n251/BlackBirdzzz/Colamax%2088GT%2096GSO/96GSODefaultfulloadtempgraph.png
再來個730/2150
https://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n251/BlackBirdzzz/Colamax%2088GT%2096GSO/96GSO7302150atitool5minpass.png
Test完了, 來個總結
優點 :
2者均試用了較大型的Heatsink, 而且有效壓制GPU的溫度
超頻能力理想, 尤其是9600GSO
9600GSO採用了同價卡較少見的1ns GDDR3, 提供了較大的超頻空間
缺點 :
8800GT改用8顆單獨的Ram Heatsink會較美觀
如果9600GSO的電感可以和8800GT看齊應該會有再高一點的超頻能力
頁:
[1]